Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-11 05:27:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C50BE105199CF3036A10E289AE18E84D61C22BE0302394CFAE1B9DA55479A5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet author is expressing an opinion, so nothing needs to be added for context. Any challenges or supplemental information, whether for or against needing context, is important and should be discussed in replies. No Note Needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645633262554071040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C50BE105199CF3036A10E289AE18E84D61C22BE0302394CFAE1B9DA55479A5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1681190835533
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16456332625540710407C50BE105199CF3036A10E289AE18E84D61C22BE0302394CFAE1B9DA55479A5F