Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-11 13:21:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22E9DF3F37DE5C5B9F2E7E95D1BD4E088C8BE6CD06DBFD0030F5A95F11447B0D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This appears to be from a filing by the legal team of the Proud Boys. There is no admission by DoJ in here, only assertions by the defense; given other dubious contentions* in the thread from the same document, it's safe to assume this is at LEAST extremely misleading/false. *https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/13/us/politics/jan-6-conspiracy-theory-ray-epps.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1645623798547337222
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 22E9DF3F37DE5C5B9F2E7E95D1BD4E088C8BE6CD06DBFD0030F5A95F11447B0D
createdAtMillis - 1681219265219
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 164562379854733722222E9DF3F37DE5C5B9F2E7E95D1BD4E088C8BE6CD06DBFD0030F5A95F11447B0D