Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-12 03:58:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E47BAC3508FD921994DFB72E781F5A37D99B1E3461B1F5D746CE17A16261D5B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

None of the sources mentioned in the author’s note mention the gender identity of the disruptive customers.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645590980106625025
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E47BAC3508FD921994DFB72E781F5A37D99B1E3461B1F5D746CE17A16261D5B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1681271893579
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1645590980106625025E47BAC3508FD921994DFB72E781F5A37D99B1E3461B1F5D746CE17A16261D5B4