Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-11 01:08:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86FFBBF0F082BFBA8D5E3EF2D32243AF028C5498C61C5A169E099DDC0B104250
Participant Details

Original Note:

None of the sources mentioned in the author’s note mention the gender identity of the disruptive customers.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645590980106625025
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86FFBBF0F082BFBA8D5E3EF2D32243AF028C5498C61C5A169E099DDC0B104250
  • createdAtMillis - 1681175297578
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164559098010662502586FFBBF0F082BFBA8D5E3EF2D32243AF028C5498C61C5A169E099DDC0B104250