Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-10 16:43:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C378931E048482D2BFDF00DC95644D6377CBCB812C79FF87D77B5E48595B3DA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Well-known fact-checkers have had to retract information once thought truthful. The ongoing Jones matter contains conflicting reports & is currently in litigation. Arbitrating ongoing disputes isn't CN's role. Tweet expresses an opinion. NNN. Fact-Check retraction example: https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/14/media/seth-rich-lawsuit-settlement-ed-butowsky/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645464100380475406
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C378931E048482D2BFDF00DC95644D6377CBCB812C79FF87D77B5E48595B3DA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1681144991325
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1645464100380475406C378931E048482D2BFDF00DC95644D6377CBCB812C79FF87D77B5E48595B3DA3