Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-10 04:07:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2BCC6C60FDD8CAF901E652FE6D8157DD3BDAD65F623A366EF63DED890F487D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This subject is debatable amongst medical professionals, and this Tweet author is expressing his professional medical opinion. Any challenges to opinions or any supplemental information would be beneficial to Twitter by generating discussion in replies. NNN. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1645247175826219010
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F2BCC6C60FDD8CAF901E652FE6D8157DD3BDAD65F623A366EF63DED890F487D5
createdAtMillis - 1681099654251
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1645247175826219010F2BCC6C60FDD8CAF901E652FE6D8157DD3BDAD65F623A366EF63DED890F487D5