Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-10 10:19:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B289B7B9A72A2B21A5016714B5CFECC892B67D4EF528AD49D229201250F7B83A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This subject is debatable amongst medical professionals, and this Tweet author is expressing his professional medical opinion. Any challenges to opinions or any supplemental information would be beneficial to Twitter by generating discussion in replies. NNN. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1645247175826219010
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B289B7B9A72A2B21A5016714B5CFECC892B67D4EF528AD49D229201250F7B83A
createdAtMillis - 1681121993599
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1645247175826219010B289B7B9A72A2B21A5016714B5CFECC892B67D4EF528AD49D229201250F7B83A