Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-09 21:19:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE5AB4887E919123E8836187D375DE3D37330775A0E9F009FE4FE87DAC5A207F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is factually correct and not misleading. Proposed note is spam, and irrelevant. Thomas's conduct is the subject of criticism even if it was technically legal, which has not been established. Please stop copying and pasting partisan talking points as notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645161526850977795
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE5AB4887E919123E8836187D375DE3D37330775A0E9F009FE4FE87DAC5A207F
  • createdAtMillis - 1681075147458
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1645161526850977795FE5AB4887E919123E8836187D375DE3D37330775A0E9F009FE4FE87DAC5A207F