Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 03:58:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4BC34A0B41032E76290F1AE47D0AE0BEF5397174CB1285C6A58E697DA3C8D98
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet was general in nature while the note contained more detail, but the Tweet was not misleading. That would have required a note. Disagreements or the addition of any supplemental information should be discussed in replies, so no note is needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645123605875785728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4BC34A0B41032E76290F1AE47D0AE0BEF5397174CB1285C6A58E697DA3C8D98
  • createdAtMillis - 1683259118900
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1645123605875785728C4BC34A0B41032E76290F1AE47D0AE0BEF5397174CB1285C6A58E697DA3C8D98