Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 13:01:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDA7765C3B8F51DF303526C2181316C574FCB8E21FE5D38F4984393FC7A9A75F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet is factually correct, so it's not misleading. It also expresses an opinion. Any disagreements or challenges or the addition of any supplemental information should be discussed in replies. No Note Needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1645054790114725889
participantId -
raterParticipantId - DDA7765C3B8F51DF303526C2181316C574FCB8E21FE5D38F4984393FC7A9A75F
createdAtMillis - 1708693283375
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1645054790114725889DDA7765C3B8F51DF303526C2181316C574FCB8E21FE5D38F4984393FC7A9A75F