Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-09 14:20:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4EA906BE64F0CFDAF46E90CE6B806739F575C8D52AB9E5C7CF82FCD9A650D58
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet is factually correct, so it's not misleading. It also expresses an opinion. Any disagreements or challenges or the addition of any supplemental information should be discussed in replies. No Note Needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645054790114725889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4EA906BE64F0CFDAF46E90CE6B806739F575C8D52AB9E5C7CF82FCD9A650D58
  • createdAtMillis - 1681050018090
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1645054790114725889D4EA906BE64F0CFDAF46E90CE6B806739F575C8D52AB9E5C7CF82FCD9A650D58