Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-10 13:39:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47427FB50480500610E5402A72AEFB4CF1D64E0080688579BE983D05D869EFEF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet is factually correct, so it's not misleading. It also expresses an opinion. Any disagreements or challenges or the addition of any supplemental information should be discussed in replies. No Note Needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1645054790114725889
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 47427FB50480500610E5402A72AEFB4CF1D64E0080688579BE983D05D869EFEF
createdAtMillis - 1681133964130
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 164505479011472588947427FB50480500610E5402A72AEFB4CF1D64E0080688579BE983D05D869EFEF