Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-10 13:39:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 074E7969CA56055B692815539ABD4E7B2CB2EB59793BB1A3E282A01F73E4CC1B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Limited interaction with the tweet in question has nothing to do with the author. Twitter has limited interaction to ALL substack links. https://www.pcmag.com/news/twitter-disables-retweets-likes-on-posts-with-substack-links https://techcrunch.com/2023/04/07/twitter-substack-censorship-retweet/ https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/6/23673043/twitter-substack-embeds-bots-tools-api

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644896305779707905
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 074E7969CA56055B692815539ABD4E7B2CB2EB59793BB1A3E282A01F73E4CC1B
createdAtMillis - 1681133991547
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1644896305779707905074E7969CA56055B692815539ABD4E7B2CB2EB59793BB1A3E282A01F73E4CC1B