Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-10 03:02:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7A578342BBF0A4920E9A067DF452440435CF4FB7D3CDD2BDDCA01B096E69996
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the information presented in the above note is important, the Tweet is expressing an opinion so no note is needed. Any challenges or supplemental information to opinions, whether for or against needing context, should be discussed in replies. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644855962228908035
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B7A578342BBF0A4920E9A067DF452440435CF4FB7D3CDD2BDDCA01B096E69996
createdAtMillis - 1681095737767
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1644855962228908035B7A578342BBF0A4920E9A067DF452440435CF4FB7D3CDD2BDDCA01B096E69996