Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-09 13:22:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4AE667302904F8E95B7090D33F8BA17140C478635D89E1D3A4B745988EE6F700
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the information presented in the above note is important, the Tweet is expressing an opinion so no note is needed. Any challenges or supplemental information to opinions, whether for or against needing context, should be discussed in replies. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644855962228908035
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4AE667302904F8E95B7090D33F8BA17140C478635D89E1D3A4B745988EE6F700
createdAtMillis - 1681046562109
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16448559622289080354AE667302904F8E95B7090D33F8BA17140C478635D89E1D3A4B745988EE6F700