Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-10 03:28:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 417E7D4B42FE71A69617AB004801249868CBE52D39C7EA2A3F4DC8A49DFC1EDA
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the information presented in the above note is important, the Tweet is expressing an opinion so no note is needed. Any challenges or supplemental information to opinions, whether for or against needing context, should be discussed in replies. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644855962228908035
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 417E7D4B42FE71A69617AB004801249868CBE52D39C7EA2A3F4DC8A49DFC1EDA
createdAtMillis - 1681097318403
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1644855962228908035417E7D4B42FE71A69617AB004801249868CBE52D39C7EA2A3F4DC8A49DFC1EDA