Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-09 00:58:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F1E148E62276FF995A4480A9B87C1F2CAAFC522D4E432927F446677D1ACD5FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the information presented in the above note is important, the Tweet is expressing an opinion so no note is needed. Any challenges or supplemental information to opinions, whether for or against needing context, should be discussed in replies. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644855962228908035
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2F1E148E62276FF995A4480A9B87C1F2CAAFC522D4E432927F446677D1ACD5FE
createdAtMillis - 1681001884860
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16448559622289080352F1E148E62276FF995A4480A9B87C1F2CAAFC522D4E432927F446677D1ACD5FE