Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-09 20:27:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29927B07D0EE89F19DED97265F0CA9DFAD51148414C6C9DEC592E21DF90DCACF
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the information presented in the above note is important, the Tweet is expressing an opinion so no note is needed. Any challenges or supplemental information to opinions, whether for or against needing context, should be discussed in replies. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644855962228908035
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 29927B07D0EE89F19DED97265F0CA9DFAD51148414C6C9DEC592E21DF90DCACF
createdAtMillis - 1681072075038
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 164485596222890803529927B07D0EE89F19DED97265F0CA9DFAD51148414C6C9DEC592E21DF90DCACF