Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-08 22:00:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C24DD8CB1AD48565B4E2F0C7946384AF179C3B9D5E60A0053C8F76439A93651
Participant Details

Original Note:

This seems to be the result of a business-to-business misunderstanding or dispute between Twitter and Substack, not censorship of viewpoints or individual writers. https://twitter.com/TitterDaily/status/1644335393108623361 https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/04/twitter-builds-a-wall-substack.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644768475653758976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C24DD8CB1AD48565B4E2F0C7946384AF179C3B9D5E60A0053C8F76439A93651
  • createdAtMillis - 1680991202844
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16447684756537589763C24DD8CB1AD48565B4E2F0C7946384AF179C3B9D5E60A0053C8F76439A93651