Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-10 14:40:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87E1D62899727A3CD3F0D9C253ED1E3D522B6A7C6EFE389230C0F57545A6AD40
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is opinion, no notes needed. Proposed notes repeat the judge's justification for his ruling, ignoring the criticism that the justification is pretextual.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644715534041116672
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87E1D62899727A3CD3F0D9C253ED1E3D522B6A7C6EFE389230C0F57545A6AD40
  • createdAtMillis - 1681137624738
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164471553404111667287E1D62899727A3CD3F0D9C253ED1E3D522B6A7C6EFE389230C0F57545A6AD40