Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-08 17:15:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6569FF4BF5B0C5E952A5909798A4A01059CE1721F869AA2BC8A5D9FF1DB373C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is opinion, no notes needed. Proposed notes repeat the judge's justification for his ruling, ignoring the criticism that the justification is pretextual.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644715534041116672
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6569FF4BF5B0C5E952A5909798A4A01059CE1721F869AA2BC8A5D9FF1DB373C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1680974100007
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16447155340411166726569FF4BF5B0C5E952A5909798A4A01059CE1721F869AA2BC8A5D9FF1DB373C7