Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-09 03:49:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80132240140A20DB7314073C39E4539E166647FE7DAA22AC57CA8417367EB48E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Regarding the first claim, Substack links themselves may not have been blocked, but interactions (likes, retweets, and replies) with tweets containing Substack links were definitely blocked. Preventing engagement with tweets will drastically limit their exposure. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/the-dumb-reason-twitter-wont-allow-retweeting-tweets-linking-to-substack/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644676052562657282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80132240140A20DB7314073C39E4539E166647FE7DAA22AC57CA8417367EB48E
  • createdAtMillis - 1681012181429
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164467605256265728280132240140A20DB7314073C39E4539E166647FE7DAA22AC57CA8417367EB48E