Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-08 18:34:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 20291AE29DFBA3397F72C146AA8FA9778CC718984EA890F99EAEB5505308A90D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Regarding the first claim, Substack links themselves may not have been blocked, but interactions (likes, retweets, and replies) with tweets containing Substack links were definitely blocked. Preventing engagement with tweets will drastically limit their exposure. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/the-dumb-reason-twitter-wont-allow-retweeting-tweets-linking-to-substack/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644676052562657282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 20291AE29DFBA3397F72C146AA8FA9778CC718984EA890F99EAEB5505308A90D
  • createdAtMillis - 1680978844899
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164467605256265728220291AE29DFBA3397F72C146AA8FA9778CC718984EA890F99EAEB5505308A90D