Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 21:07:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8413633E576A4D72316DCBCC16DD6B9362C24EB27398FCD7DBA90B344D27F010
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested note itself is misleading/misinfo: The article/investigation cites multiple instances of trips to non-owned non-private-residences, clearly placing them outside of the "personal hospitality" exception carved out by federal law. Tweet accurate, no note necessary. https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-scotus-undisclosed-luxury-travel-gifts-crow

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644395281411080194
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8413633E576A4D72316DCBCC16DD6B9362C24EB27398FCD7DBA90B344D27F010
  • createdAtMillis - 1680901659201
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16443952814110801948413633E576A4D72316DCBCC16DD6B9362C24EB27398FCD7DBA90B344D27F010