Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-08 08:35:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 622B9EFEA299842ECC7AE3BD30023C74200DC735465ECF7FF07F253DB503833E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Just to address note stating this is not a "new story" and citing a 2011 article, the piece *begins* with an example from 2019, demonstrating previously unreported on ties and instances. It is, then, a new story; suggested note would actually confuse matters, not clarify. https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-scotus-undisclosed-luxury-travel-gifts-crow

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644374713911713792
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 622B9EFEA299842ECC7AE3BD30023C74200DC735465ECF7FF07F253DB503833E
  • createdAtMillis - 1680942905739
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644374713911713792622B9EFEA299842ECC7AE3BD30023C74200DC735465ECF7FF07F253DB503833E