Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-09 22:56:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F13FCCE5FAADEB2F146E10AA173A9578855299969B814DB82A5604524B23194
Participant Details

Original Note:

Just to address note stating this is not a "new story" and citing a 2011 article, the piece *begins* with an example from 2019, demonstrating previously unreported on ties and instances. It is, then, a new story; suggested note would actually confuse matters, not clarify. https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-scotus-undisclosed-luxury-travel-gifts-crow

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644374713911713792
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F13FCCE5FAADEB2F146E10AA173A9578855299969B814DB82A5604524B23194
  • createdAtMillis - 1681081011361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16443747139117137920F13FCCE5FAADEB2F146E10AA173A9578855299969B814DB82A5604524B23194