Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-08 03:53:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B905FD912CC3CB09338E3FCD4834B8E7B4FEAF5D9BDE47D7F21C52893255FF60
Participant Details

Original Note:

The question implies an argument that suffers from the fallacy of 'hasty generalization'. Just because two things seem related doesn't mean one caused the other. The behavior of adherents or societal conditions don't determine the truth of a religion. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Hasty-Generalization

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644205561779478528
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B905FD912CC3CB09338E3FCD4834B8E7B4FEAF5D9BDE47D7F21C52893255FF60
  • createdAtMillis - 1680926024766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644205561779478528B905FD912CC3CB09338E3FCD4834B8E7B4FEAF5D9BDE47D7F21C52893255FF60