Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-08 00:13:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9E09A77CCB3ACE4BC6A35604E8D07D4612E7FF9E1545AE12332D46F47DCB2C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le falta una mejor redacción, al primer momento podría interpretarse que son un caso en conjunto, pero, son dos casos independientes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644200497891643394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F9E09A77CCB3ACE4BC6A35604E8D07D4612E7FF9E1545AE12332D46F47DCB2C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1680912830721
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1644200497891643394F9E09A77CCB3ACE4BC6A35604E8D07D4612E7FF9E1545AE12332D46F47DCB2C9