Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 06:38:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4269E9BEC1622E827626DC0322B6AF0B158D8BB47707EBD5ADE2C58D06B22FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le falta una mejor redacción, al primer momento podría interpretarse que son un caso en conjunto, pero, son dos casos independientes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644200497891643394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4269E9BEC1622E827626DC0322B6AF0B158D8BB47707EBD5ADE2C58D06B22FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1680849516331
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644200497891643394F4269E9BEC1622E827626DC0322B6AF0B158D8BB47707EBD5ADE2C58D06B22FA