Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 08:49:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5CCE6BC8951B6D78DB52A2F513870357B5AD50207F0828A54DDEF2B2E5451D3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le falta una mejor redacción, al primer momento podría interpretarse que son un caso en conjunto, pero, son dos casos independientes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644200497891643394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B5CCE6BC8951B6D78DB52A2F513870357B5AD50207F0828A54DDEF2B2E5451D3
  • createdAtMillis - 1680857365151
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644200497891643394B5CCE6BC8951B6D78DB52A2F513870357B5AD50207F0828A54DDEF2B2E5451D3