Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 16:26:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F774D2537047A47D55EA232F6A7FB9A967A6AAE735F86F572353F8191048FDF5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses personal opinion. Note not needed. Really interesting how two contributors are leaving identical notes on multiple tweets on this topic. “Genuinely and constructively contribute to help others stay informed. Do not attempt to game or manipulate the system” https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644173199440252928
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F774D2537047A47D55EA232F6A7FB9A967A6AAE735F86F572353F8191048FDF5
createdAtMillis - 1680884789204
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1644173199440252928F774D2537047A47D55EA232F6A7FB9A967A6AAE735F86F572353F8191048FDF5