Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 11:29:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C69D62CF8390E5EF0A5F6813F66BB5D63F26078794E64658D4CCAA53FD3BD8D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses personal opinion. Note not needed. Really interesting how two contributors are leaving identical notes on multiple tweets on this topic. “Genuinely and constructively contribute to help others stay informed. Do not attempt to game or manipulate the system” https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644173199440252928
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C69D62CF8390E5EF0A5F6813F66BB5D63F26078794E64658D4CCAA53FD3BD8D9
createdAtMillis - 1680866990466
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1644173199440252928C69D62CF8390E5EF0A5F6813F66BB5D63F26078794E64658D4CCAA53FD3BD8D9