Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 15:09:55 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5AEBF84BA6D1CA69FD58344F6EFD804F6D943E48B5C5DA2E74055E6EEE68998B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses personal opinion. Note not needed. Really interesting how two contributors are leaving identical notes on multiple tweets on this topic. “Genuinely and constructively contribute to help others stay informed. Do not attempt to game or manipulate the system” https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644173199440252928
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5AEBF84BA6D1CA69FD58344F6EFD804F6D943E48B5C5DA2E74055E6EEE68998B
createdAtMillis - 1680880195153
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16441731994402529285AEBF84BA6D1CA69FD58344F6EFD804F6D943E48B5C5DA2E74055E6EEE68998B