Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-09 14:33:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 481F1D7E7ED5F991CAB9EAACC9830399D230CB23F0E6D6DFAFCBF6FFED5535E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses personal opinion. Note not needed. Really interesting how two contributors are leaving identical notes on multiple tweets on this topic. “Genuinely and constructively contribute to help others stay informed. Do not attempt to game or manipulate the system” https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644173199440252928
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 481F1D7E7ED5F991CAB9EAACC9830399D230CB23F0E6D6DFAFCBF6FFED5535E0
createdAtMillis - 1681050799344
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1644173199440252928481F1D7E7ED5F991CAB9EAACC9830399D230CB23F0E6D6DFAFCBF6FFED5535E0