Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 15:11:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 20558A8E59165A29BB77DCFD1B1E16B18D9AB26ADCDCAEB80FEEF9C83DAB4AA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses personal opinion. Note not needed. Really interesting how two contributors are leaving identical notes on multiple tweets on this topic. “Genuinely and constructively contribute to help others stay informed. Do not attempt to game or manipulate the system” https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1644173199440252928
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 20558A8E59165A29BB77DCFD1B1E16B18D9AB26ADCDCAEB80FEEF9C83DAB4AA8
createdAtMillis - 1680880306799
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 164417319944025292820558A8E59165A29BB77DCFD1B1E16B18D9AB26ADCDCAEB80FEEF9C83DAB4AA8