Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 19:07:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C01687478602E77F8CE4C11A53D98313D6F2F08FAE1C839EAE8533F723E36654
Participant Details

Original Note:

The way the tweet was written can make it seem as if the judge donated much more than he did, however the tweet is factual as the judge did donate money, allegedly.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644141748262776833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C01687478602E77F8CE4C11A53D98313D6F2F08FAE1C839EAE8533F723E36654
  • createdAtMillis - 1680894442573
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644141748262776833C01687478602E77F8CE4C11A53D98313D6F2F08FAE1C839EAE8533F723E36654