Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 14:42:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C6CBA1AD2FC2CEE5A6378F76D0A3CB73C768130EEE629BE5323FDA46F3E524C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The way the tweet was written can make it seem as if the judge donated much more than he did, however the tweet is factual as the judge did donate money, allegedly.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644141748262776833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C6CBA1AD2FC2CEE5A6378F76D0A3CB73C768130EEE629BE5323FDA46F3E524C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680878578108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16441417482627768333C6CBA1AD2FC2CEE5A6378F76D0A3CB73C768130EEE629BE5323FDA46F3E524C