Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 10:51:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F4AD317BFE11BCC8ADF18882788849E230ADC87A974A9A328B7D1DAEEA49900
Participant Details

Original Note:

The way the tweet was written can make it seem as if the judge donated much more than he did, however the tweet is factual as the judge did donate money, allegedly.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644141748262776833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F4AD317BFE11BCC8ADF18882788849E230ADC87A974A9A328B7D1DAEEA49900
  • createdAtMillis - 1680864687067
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16441417482627768330F4AD317BFE11BCC8ADF18882788849E230ADC87A974A9A328B7D1DAEEA49900