Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 14:50:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01D4689F2EE90812204A013E6AD7B88855DCD1FFAC7A24224C6DC0A0719DFEDF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The way the tweet was written can make it seem as if the judge donated much more than he did, however the tweet is factual as the judge did donate money, allegedly.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644141748262776833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01D4689F2EE90812204A013E6AD7B88855DCD1FFAC7A24224C6DC0A0719DFEDF
  • createdAtMillis - 1680879039839
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164414174826277683301D4689F2EE90812204A013E6AD7B88855DCD1FFAC7A24224C6DC0A0719DFEDF