Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 17:50:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63B1536D0F7AD0517E0AF44267A8A677DF30E06771C2EBA10DA27C93386556E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is false. From the full report he is citing, it is clear that the 22M number is related to the analysis this academic group did after the election and had nothing to do with flagging or censorship. https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/1644093075441201153

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644098537662345216
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63B1536D0F7AD0517E0AF44267A8A677DF30E06771C2EBA10DA27C93386556E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1680889844494
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164409853766234521663B1536D0F7AD0517E0AF44267A8A677DF30E06771C2EBA10DA27C93386556E5