Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 05:00:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61FF65F293F530EEBC3195C05F4C8BBDDF40543AD00A90EBCF34F465F410860C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is false. From the full report he is citing, it is clear that the 22M number is related to the analysis this academic group did after the election and had nothing to do with flagging or censorship. https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/1644093075441201153

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644098537662345216
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61FF65F293F530EEBC3195C05F4C8BBDDF40543AD00A90EBCF34F465F410860C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680843651100
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164409853766234521661FF65F293F530EEBC3195C05F4C8BBDDF40543AD00A90EBCF34F465F410860C