Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 15:17:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5AEBF84BA6D1CA69FD58344F6EFD804F6D943E48B5C5DA2E74055E6EEE68998B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Efficacy and safety post-marketing surveillance data was published for peer review as a legal reuirement. There's no evidence any data was intentionally or unintentionally hidden https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110345

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644094688306102276
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5AEBF84BA6D1CA69FD58344F6EFD804F6D943E48B5C5DA2E74055E6EEE68998B
  • createdAtMillis - 1680880649176
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16440946883061022765AEBF84BA6D1CA69FD58344F6EFD804F6D943E48B5C5DA2E74055E6EEE68998B