Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 04:27:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45781C08C5BC89D8E34E1303F16314B430F214D0AC728A2C28148B2D85E2CEC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Efficacy and safety post-marketing surveillance data was published for peer review as a legal reuirement. There's no evidence any data was intentionally or unintentionally hidden https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110345

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644094688306102276
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45781C08C5BC89D8E34E1303F16314B430F214D0AC728A2C28148B2D85E2CEC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1680841637623
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164409468830610227645781C08C5BC89D8E34E1303F16314B430F214D0AC728A2C28148B2D85E2CEC9