Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-06 23:29:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7815B3EF7D46E4D0688EAF8C27C221CF3D37D7F72C59B9DEC5BF6BC85B6C6E8E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article is a factual discussion of the interagency review. Disagreement with the conclusions of that review is a matter for comments, not for community notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644043058915209226
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7815B3EF7D46E4D0688EAF8C27C221CF3D37D7F72C59B9DEC5BF6BC85B6C6E8E
  • createdAtMillis - 1680823759643
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16440430589152092267815B3EF7D46E4D0688EAF8C27C221CF3D37D7F72C59B9DEC5BF6BC85B6C6E8E