Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-06 20:59:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00A5C9EBF7FD59793C88C763D13258E21997057AAF27F6160F1A2E9B4892E53D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article is a factual discussion of the interagency review. Disagreement with the conclusions of that review is a matter for comments, not for community notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644043058915209226
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00A5C9EBF7FD59793C88C763D13258E21997057AAF27F6160F1A2E9B4892E53D
  • createdAtMillis - 1680814799359
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164404305891520922600A5C9EBF7FD59793C88C763D13258E21997057AAF27F6160F1A2E9B4892E53D