Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 02:34:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD5EF9C900C3E521FF7C18F86F9B023DA6958B3F2931E48499C0308F9028858B
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the ethics laws actually that apply to the US Supreme are extremely limited, accepting the trips fell through loopholes meaning they were not illegal. Recently, the court has tightened its rules, but these still only require more disclosure. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/03/28/supreme-court-disclosures-trips-gifts/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644020064398483481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD5EF9C900C3E521FF7C18F86F9B023DA6958B3F2931E48499C0308F9028858B
  • createdAtMillis - 1680834847045
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644020064398483481BD5EF9C900C3E521FF7C18F86F9B023DA6958B3F2931E48499C0308F9028858B