Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-06 17:08:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 92B6C4F354B863069D8FDCFCE28AD9A700129A6CA43609CBA4A68E9ECA8E55AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the ethics laws actually that apply to the US Supreme are extremely limited, accepting the trips fell through loopholes meaning they were not illegal. Recently, the court has tightened its rules, but these still only require more disclosure. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/03/28/supreme-court-disclosures-trips-gifts/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644020064398483481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 92B6C4F354B863069D8FDCFCE28AD9A700129A6CA43609CBA4A68E9ECA8E55AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1680800902309
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 164402006439848348192B6C4F354B863069D8FDCFCE28AD9A700129A6CA43609CBA4A68E9ECA8E55AA