Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 13:54:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 818F1D53AAA693D63AE0CA92285E895FCB61C884BCE51CE76C8916CE155C9667
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the ethics laws actually that apply to the US Supreme are extremely limited, accepting the trips fell through loopholes meaning they were not illegal. Recently, the court has tightened its rules, but these still only require more disclosure. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/03/28/supreme-court-disclosures-trips-gifts/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644020064398483481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 818F1D53AAA693D63AE0CA92285E895FCB61C884BCE51CE76C8916CE155C9667
  • createdAtMillis - 1680875692526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1644020064398483481818F1D53AAA693D63AE0CA92285E895FCB61C884BCE51CE76C8916CE155C9667