Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-06 17:28:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63A8B9884F06A04F9FFB674EAFCADDC473F9DDF301030E5D5DC1B8AFD80B120E
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the ethics laws actually that apply to the US Supreme are extremely limited, accepting the trips fell through loopholes meaning they were not illegal. Recently, the court has tightened its rules, but these still only require more disclosure. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/03/28/supreme-court-disclosures-trips-gifts/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644020064398483481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63A8B9884F06A04F9FFB674EAFCADDC473F9DDF301030E5D5DC1B8AFD80B120E
  • createdAtMillis - 1680802100083
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164402006439848348163A8B9884F06A04F9FFB674EAFCADDC473F9DDF301030E5D5DC1B8AFD80B120E