Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 06:31:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 345F5A0C0E276448FEB1AC828349FF66F069055E242AE9F593E691387D1332DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the ethics laws actually that apply to the US Supreme are extremely limited, accepting the trips fell through loopholes meaning they were not illegal. Recently, the court has tightened its rules, but these still only require more disclosure. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/03/28/supreme-court-disclosures-trips-gifts/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644020064398483481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 345F5A0C0E276448FEB1AC828349FF66F069055E242AE9F593E691387D1332DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1680849109306
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1644020064398483481345F5A0C0E276448FEB1AC828349FF66F069055E242AE9F593E691387D1332DB